A Suggested Letter to Your Priest or Bishop

I have been associated with a group that has been meeting weekly to study discipleship since May of this year. With all that has happened concerning sexual abuse, Cardinal McCarrick and related issues, our group has detoured some from our original purpose in order to discuss the state of affairs in the Catholic Church. Eventually, the group decided to invite our pastor to join us for a frank discussion, with the hope that the conversation would help us individually and as a group discern how we might take action to address the Church’s problems.

Here is a draft of our letter. We encourage you to use it, edited or not, for yourself or for a group of which you are a member. So copy it, paste it, edit it or just use it as inspiration for what you and people you know would like to communicate to your shepherds.

Dear Pastor:

Our [describe group] Group has been meeting since ______ of this year. In addition to our normal activities, the events that have taken place in the Catholic Church in recent months have also been the subject of our study and discussion.

Without getting into all the details, the basic concern of our group is that there appears to be an overall lack of accountability in the culture of Catholic clergy. In addition to a lack of adequate vigilance regarding sexual abuse and homosexual behavior on the part of clergy, the clergy have generally been passive with respect to a number of other issues: couples cohabiting outside marriage, Catholic married couples receiving Holy Communion despite not following the Church’s teachings on contraception, Catholic politicians supporting abortion rights, the frequency of annulments of marriage and the overall confusion of many Catholics on other moral issues.  It seems to us that our clergy could be providing helpful clarifications on documents and statements issued by Pope Francis and which are additional sources of confusion.

 Our group wishes to meet with you to have an open discussion about the issue of clergy accountability. We strongly desire your wisdom and advice. As do many Catholics, we have a desire to take action in some way, yet we want to make sure we have received the full benefit of your perspectives on the various specific issues that concern us. 

Please let us know if you would be willing to meet with us and when such a meeting might take place. 

The Big Question for Catholics Who Are Striving To Be Faithful

Whether someone agrees or not with what Archbishop Vigano has been writing and doing, in his “Third Statement” released this past week, he asks the question that is now confronting every Catholic in the United States who is striving to be faithful to the established teachings and practices of the Catholic Church. Here are Vigano’s words: “How could you, you who were aware of the truth, remain silent in the midst of so much falsehood and depravity?”

This is the question every one of us must ask ourselves.

What is the truth that forces us to respond? This truth is that it is all too apparent that there is very little accountability for the clergy in the Catholic Church.

For years, even decades, “Catholic” politicians have been voting to support and even expand abortion rights in the United States. Priests and even bishops have been guilty of sexually abusing minors and adults. The Pope, and many cardinals, bishops and priests have openly supported and encouraged unchaste homosexuality. It is clear that there is a serious problem with homosexual priests and bishops. Pope Francis has issued statements and documents which compromise the traditional moral teachings of the Church. Almost the entire clergy, including our most orthodox bishops and priests, has abandoned placing any significant emphasis on the Church’s teachings on contraception. We all know that the great majority of Catholic married couples are not adhering to the Church’s teachings on contraception. Our Church teaches that this is a mortal sin. Shouldn’t this be a prominent issue in the Church?

Vigano refers in his Third Statement to the “conspiracy of silence” in the Catholic Church. As to all of the circumstances described above, which cry out for at least someone in authority to acknowledge the problem and seek correction, there is a conspiracy of silence. There has finally been a response to the sexual abuse of minors, but doctrinal abuse has generally gone unchallenged. Even the response on sexual abuse has been late by many decades and has serious inadequacies.

In many of the blogs and other public discussions on this problem, there are many proposed suggestions as to what the laity should do. The laity are obviously limited by the fact that lay persons will never have authority over clergy under Canon Law. The laity has influence but no authority.

There’s an even bigger problem. It’s clear that the percentage of people who call themselves Catholic and are striving to be faithful to the teachings of the Church is small, much less than 50%. So even if all these Catholics in a particular diocese communicate their concerns, should they expect a substantive response? Are there enough of them to matter? And if there is no adequate response, what do these Catholics do then?

I don’t know the answer. In the past week. I have had several conversations about all this with Catholics whom I know, and similar conversations are going on around the country. The dominant theme is that it is a matter of personal integrity, personal conscience, to do and say something. I’d be curious to know what suggestions you have. I am challenging myself to do something. I’m not sure yet what I’ll do.

A Laundry List for U. S. Bishops

Well, I haven’t posted a blog in some time, so I might as well stir up some controversy. Since my last posting, the Catholic Church has been turned upside down by allegations of sexual misconduct involving high-ranking clergy and even implicating Pope Francis in covering up some of those who have engaged in sexual improprieties with minors and adults.

A few things to keep in mind. In the Catholic Church, one bishop and even a group of bishops do not have any authority over another bishop. Only the pope has authority over a bishop. As a result of this structure of authority, the U. S. Conference of Bishops cannot legislate, cannot pass rules or decisions, that are binding on any bishop. This obviously can make the accountability of bishops problematical, in the sense that the pope may not have the resources or the will power to correct a bishop or group of bishops. It also contributes to the reluctance of bishops to publicly correct another bishop.

In addition to all this, there is no recognized process for the correction or discipline of a pope. This is why, for example, if the U. S. bishops seek access to documents under the control of the Vatican in their attempt to determine the details of the Cardinal McCarrick situation, the Vatican could decline to produce relevant documents and the U. S. bishops would have no recourse.

The lack of adequate procedures for accountability in all levels of the clergy has led many to recommend an expansion of the role of the laity in the Church. However, the laity will never have authority over priests, bishops or the pope. At most, the laity could be empowered to receive reports and allegations and to investigate, report findings and make recommendations in response to allegations, but their role could go no farther.

Okay. I could go on with more preliminary comments, but let’s get to the laundry list I have put together.

  1. The U. S. bishops need to oversee an aggressive investigation of the sexual misdeeds of Cardinal McCarrick. They have said they are going to empower a panel of lay experts to conduct the investigation. They need to name the panel and get them started. Those who were complicit in McCarrick’s sexual improprieties (Cardinal Wuerl and others) should be pressured to resign or abdicate their positions, if their resignations are awaiting papal acceptance.

  2. New procedures for establishing the accountability of bishops, cardinals and popes should be adopted and included in Canon Law. The accountability should not only apply to sexual violations but also to behaviors and decisions which violate the established traditions of the Catholic Church.

  3. The existing procedures for the protection of minors should be revised to include sexual advances by clergy toward adults. They should be further modified to provide that allegations of violations by clergy would be reported to a lay individual and/or lay panel, and the investigation of such allegations would be made by qualified lay persons.

  4. Each diocese in the United States should conduct a competent investigation and make an objective determination of the extent of active homosexuals in the clergy within the diocese. Active homosexuals should be barred from engaging in any clerical functions in the diocese.

  5. Those in the clergy who are promoting or tolerating the promotion of active homosexuality should be required to cease such activity.

  6. Catholics who actively and publicly promote or support abortion rights, especially politicians who vote in favor of abortion rights, should be given warning and, if they do not publicly repent and desist, should be promptly excommunicated. Penalties should be set forth In Canon Law for bishops who do not enforce this requirement.

  7. The Church needs to end the scandal of permitting cohabiting couples to be married in the Catholic Church (and in many cases receiving Holy Communion at their wedding Mass). If Canon Law inhibits priests from withholding marriage in such situations, Canon Law should be updated to adequately address this situation.

  8. The Church needs to end the scandal of the frequency and ease of obtaining annulments of marriage. The provisions of Canon Law which address the grounds of annulment on the basis of defects of consent should be reexamined and revised. The Catholic doctrine of consent in marriage is based on Roman custom and has no substantial Scriptural or theological basis. The Orthodox Church, for example, does not hold that consent “makes” the marriage, as the Catholic Church does.

  9. There should be public corrections of Pope Francis by individual bishops as often as necessary. I realize that it would be difficult for a bishop to tell the Catholics in his diocese that some of what the Pope does and says is not reliable. As the spiritual shepherd, however, the bishop has a duty to tell the people entrusted to him when the Pope has strayed from established doctrine and practices. I’ve read many of the documents issued or approved by Pope Francis. I’ve never seen anything like them in the history of the Church.

I welcome comments and corrections regarding these proposals.